<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Southern Seminary &#8211; Chad Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/category/authors/chad-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<managingEditor>web@sbts.edu (Offices of Communications and Campus Technology)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>web@sbts.edu (Offices of Communications and Campus Technology)</webMaster>
	
	<category>Christianity</category>
	<copyright>Copyright 2013, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary</copyright>
			<item>
		<title>A Bridge Too Far? Charles Leiter and an Over-Realized Soteriology</title>
		<link>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2013/03/25/a-bridge-too-far-charles-leiter-and-an-over-realized-soteriology/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-bridge-too-far-charles-leiter-and-an-over-realized-soteriology</link>
		<comments>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2013/03/25/a-bridge-too-far-charles-leiter-and-an-over-realized-soteriology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his classic account of the battle of Arnhem in World War II, Cornelius Ryan details that though the Allies won the battle, they extended themselves more than they should have by going one bridge too far in their planning, causing unnecessary loss of life. Charles Leiter has written a helpful book on justification and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his classic account of the battle of Arnhem in World War II, Cornelius Ryan details that though the Allies won the battle, they extended themselves more than they should have by going one bridge too far in their planning, causing unnecessary loss of life. Charles Leiter has written a helpful book on justification and regeneration, one that fills a gap at the layman&#8217;s level. This book has many helpful things to say about the relationship between these two aspects of the doctrine of salvation. At the end of the day, however, I am concerned that the book goes too far in its exposition of regeneration, farther than Scripture would allow.</p>
<p><span id="more-608"></span></p>
<p>Let me first say some things about the value of the book. It begins by laying out a biblical doctrine of the nature of sin. It depicts human sin as universal, pervasive, irrational, deceitful, hardening, enslaving, debasing, and defiling. It explains that sin is both internal (a bad heart) and external (a bad record). The book then explains in no uncertain terms a Reformation doctrine of justification. Leiter depicts the fact that in justification, God has “put down his gun,” and given us eternal life (p. 41).</p>
<p>Leiter then gives an exposition of the doctrine of regeneration. He shows, rightly, that Scripture uses a variety of metaphors and images to explain what regeneration means. When I teach the doctrine of regeneration in Systematic Theology I lay out the message in very much the same fashion as this author does. Regeneration means that we are new creatures, new men, that we have a new heart, that we have been given a new birth, a new nature. It also means that we have been united with Christ in his crucifixion and his resurrection. Regeneration entails the truth that we are no longer “in the flesh,” rather, we are “in the Spirit.” We are now seated in the heavenly realm in Christ. We are no longer sold under sin, but have the righteousness of Christ. We are no longer under the law, but under grace, and are not now in Adam, but in Christ (pp. 47-130). All of this is true, and is crucial for Christian people to understand.</p>
<p><a href="http://chadowenbrand.com" target="_blank">Read more at ChadOwenBrand.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2013/03/25/a-bridge-too-far-charles-leiter-and-an-over-realized-soteriology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Five Political Points of Calvinism</title>
		<link>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/09/17/the-five-political-points-of-calvinism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-five-political-points-of-calvinism</link>
		<comments>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/09/17/the-five-political-points-of-calvinism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an excerpt from my forthcoming book with Tom Pratt, Seeking the City. One of the great questions that has been raised by historians is whether or not John Calvin’s views were the basis of later Republicanism, such as that which prevailed in the American experience in the 1770’s and 1780’s. The best answer seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an excerpt from my forthcoming book with Tom Pratt, <em>Seeking the City</em>.</p>
<address>One of the great questions that has been raised by historians is whether or not John Calvin’s views were the basis of later Republicanism, such as that which prevailed in the American experience in the 1770’s and 1780’s. The best answer seems to be that Jefferson and Madison worked out an approach to government that was consistent with some Calvinist ideals, especially in regards to human depravity and the need for limited government, but clearly not identical.<span id="more-372"></span></address>
<p><a href="http://chadowenbrand.com/?p=225">Read the rest at ChadOwenBrand.com. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/09/17/the-five-political-points-of-calvinism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Influential Books in My Life</title>
		<link>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/07/31/most-influential-books-in-my-life/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=most-influential-books-in-my-life</link>
		<comments>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/07/31/most-influential-books-in-my-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chad Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw that another SBTS faculty member posted a list of spiritual classics. I have been often asked by students and church members about the books that have most influenced my life. I am going to do a Top Ten with some annotations, and then I will list some “honorable mention” books. Except for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that another SBTS faculty member posted a list of spiritual classics. I have been often asked by students and church members about the books that have most influenced my life.<span id="more-185"></span> I am going to do a Top Ten with some annotations, and then I will list some “honorable mention” books. Except for the first one, they are in no necessary order, and if I wrote this a year from now the list might change a little, but not much. So, here goes . . .</p>
<p><strong>The Bible.</strong> I say this not to be “spiritual,” or as a necessary and perfunctory comment, but because it is true. Literally true. I learned from my mentor early on, “Read the Bible every day to find God’s will for your life and do it every time you find it.” I have tried to do that. My early reading was from the KJV, so many passages are etched in my memory from that “most influential book in the world,” as it has been called. But I have also read it through in many other translations. A friend once said in a sermon, “We ought to know the Bible so well that our blood runs bibline.” I agree with that, and with Schaeffer’s famous dictum that nothing can so change a person’s life like reading the Bible every day for fifty years.</p>
<p><strong>Augustus Strong, <em>Systematic Theology</em>.</strong> This may come as a surprise, what with all the newer theologies out there: Garrett, Grudem, Erickson, and with some of the great older ones now available to us like Bavinck. But they say you always remember your first kiss, and this was my first Systematic. I read it through in a one-semester theology class I took when I was nineteen. I though I was going t die in the first hundred pages, but by the time I was in the last hundred I heard the voice of the Spirit whispering (no, it was not a revelation, DB), “This is for you.” I do not use it as a textbook–I get enough complaints about Erickson and the fine print in Strong is a little daunting. But it was the book that sank in the hook. It still rests within arm reach of my desk.</p>
<p><strong>D. Martyn Lloyd Jones, <em>Spiritual Depression</em>.</strong> Some of my friends reading this are probably saying, “That makes sense.” I read this when I was twenty (a theme?), and it began a revolution in my understanding of sanctification. I spent my teen years immersed in Keswick Higher-Life teaching. I had read every book with titles like “Keys to the Deeper Life,” “Life on the Highest Plane,” and with key words in their titles life “victory,” “secret,” “path,” “overcoming,” and so on. Now those books are often helpful, and now in my later years I see how some of them were actually close to the mark–some of them. But Lloyd-Jones introduced me to the Puritans and to a Reformed spirituality that was closer to a biblical model than that of Watchman Nee or Hannah Whitall Smith. I will always be grateful to him for that and plan to tell him one day.</p>
<p><a href="http://chadowenbrand.com/?p=208">Read the rest at ChadOwenBrand.com. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/07/31/most-influential-books-in-my-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gospel Clothed in Profanity</title>
		<link>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/06/08/the-gospel-clothed-in-profanity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-gospel-clothed-in-profanity</link>
		<comments>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/06/08/the-gospel-clothed-in-profanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Owen Brand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of us have spent several weeks looking forward to the appearance of the History Channel’s mini-series, Hatfields and McCoys. With a stellar cast (Kevin Costner, Bill Paxton, Tom Berenger and others), and produced by Kevin Costner (among others), the trailers have been whetting my historical appetite for some time, not least due to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us have spent several weeks looking forward to the appearance of the History Channel’s mini-series, Hatfields and McCoys. With a stellar cast (Kevin Costner, Bill Paxton, Tom Berenger and others), and produced by Kevin Costner (among others), the trailers have been whetting my historical appetite for some time, not least due to the fact that the events took place not far from where I have been pastoring for the last year and a half. <span id="more-91"></span> The last three nights, my lady and I sat up and watched all three episodes, which, including commercials (entertaining ones, so they were not all that odious) ran to just over six hours of viewing. So, what of it?</p>
<p><a href="http://chadowenbrand.com/?p=190">Read the rest at ChadOwenBrand.com.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sbts.edu/blogs/2012/06/08/the-gospel-clothed-in-profanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
